« Dystopian Nightmares | Main | Maybe Even True »
Ooops!
Do you think the administration might have made a wee little miscalculation here on the whole Chalabi thing?
Of all the errors and miscalculations of the war and the occupation, I think this one is by far the least forgivable. Intelligence is always uncertain, planning is always hard, etc. But "don't trust the advice of exiles" has been part of the political folk wisdom since at least Machiavelli's time. In the particular case of Chalabi, evidence that he should not be trusted was widely available, and widely reported, for several years before the whole march to war ever began. It would have been easy -- very easy -- to get this right.
UPDATE: The available coverage isn't 100 percent clear, but the charge appears to be that Ahmed was producing counterfeit dinars and then his nephew Salem killed Haithem Fadhil, Director General of the Finance Ministry, as part of a coverup. A nasty business, that. Who would have thought that a man with a history of bank fraud on the one hand, and forgery on the other, would get involved in something like counterfeiting? Why, it's almost as if he said, "hey -- I could use my forgery skills to defraud a bank!"
August 8, 2004 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345160fd69e200d8342115e753ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ooops!:
» Exiles from Explananda
Matthew Yglesias writes: Of all the errors and miscalculations of the war and the occupation, I think this one is by far the least forgivable. Intelligence is always uncertain, planning is always hard, etc. But "don't trust the advice of... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 8, 2004 7:24:49 PM
» Exiles from Explananda
Matthew Yglesias writes: Of all the errors and miscalculations of the war and the occupation, I think this one is by far the least forgivable. Intelligence is always uncertain, planning is always hard, etc. But "don't trust the advice of... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 21, 2004 5:32:01 PM
» Exiles from Explananda
Matthew Yglesias writes: Of all the errors and miscalculations of the war and the occupation, I think this one is by far the least forgivable. Intelligence is always uncertain, planning is always hard, etc. But "don't trust the advice of... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 13, 2005 11:43:11 AM
» Gift Basket
from Tom Jamme's Blog
Sweet Blessings, a new Christian-based online shop featuring cookie bouquets, candy bouquets and gift baskets, opens with a campaign to donate a portion of all profits to Habitat For Humanity. The devastation of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, while not a... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 7, 2005 12:40:14 AM
» Miami Arena Makes Bid as Glitterati Central from the DETROIT FREE
the house emcee persuades old men to take off their shirts, everyone is wearing white and it's socially acceptable [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 7, 2006 1:02:18 AM
» Global Report: AIDS at a Crossroads from to AIDS is at
to AIDS is at a crossroads, according to a new report from the United Nations. [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 8, 2006 8:55:10 AM
» U.N. agency proposes plan to track birds
(AP)
from fit wild birds
and monitor their annual migrations to help combat the spread of the deadly H5N1 bird flu. [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 8, 2006 4:52:22 PM
» Black Caucus opposes Jefferson treatment
(AP)
from to strip embattled
post triggered a backlash Thursday as the Congressional Black Caucus opposed the move and said the Louisiana lawmaker deserves a presumption [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 12, 2006 1:51:21 AM
Comments
Breathless Rubin editorial in 5-4-3-2 ...
Posted by: praktike | Aug 8, 2004 4:05:42 PM
Assuming of course that they wanted to get it right. He was a convenient frontman, that's all. It's not like they needed to be convinced.
Posted by: Barry Freed | Aug 8, 2004 4:10:14 PM
Salem Chalabi too?
That is not a good sign.
Posted by: SoCalJustice | Aug 8, 2004 4:20:05 PM
Reagan couldn't have chosen a worse moment to kick the bucket: it let the Chalabites off the meathook way too early. Personally, I consider the whole of the Chalabi story almost as bad as Abu Ghraib for the simple fact that it can't be explained with a 'shhh...we do it all the time' moral indolence. It's about treason; it cuts to the quick.
Please, someone hoist Jabba back onto his hook!
Posted by: djangone | Aug 8, 2004 4:22:55 PM
From MY's update:
Both men were reportedly out of the country Sunday.
This should be a huge, HUGE, scandal.
Salem is in charge of the Saddam prosecution. If he never goes back to Iraq because of this arrest warrant, shouldn't that be a huge story?
Posted by: SoCalJustice | Aug 8, 2004 4:57:31 PM
I never debated directly with you, SoCalJustice, during my one-week stay at LGF, but I've heard some people say that you're the one decent person in that godforsaken place. Now I'm wondering you're reconsidering the IQ drainage that comes as a consequence of proximity to Powderfinger, JohnCV, NYNana, Ploome, 'Nam Grunt and the rest of the Way Huge and Important Thinkers over there. For his own good, Charles ought to request a retainer for you to stick around LGF and foreswear posts like the above on this forum.
Posted by: djangone | Aug 8, 2004 5:19:15 PM
Do we have any reason to think it's true?
On the one side we have the liar Chalabi.
On the other side....
Any reason to believe he was actually a spy for iran?
Well, but he's widely reported as buddying up with Sadr. So which iraqi politicians have widespread name recognition and aren't in bed with Allawi and the americans? Only Sadr and Chalabi. They'll kill Sadr if they can catch him. Reason to arrest Chalabi and his nephew? Do they need any more reason to than that he's a loose cannon, a well-known politician who's out of control?
The story could easily be true. But what basis do we have to guess whether it is true or not?
Posted by: J Thomas | Aug 8, 2004 7:36:14 PM
What will Hitchens say?
See his last one "Ahmed and me":
http://www.slate.com/id/2101345
"Anyone taking part in the Iraqi transition has to be a full-blown hardnose..."
Latest evidence is he got that right, at least.
Posted by: Otto | Aug 8, 2004 8:14:06 PM
Tell me that that "Ahmed and me" article is a parody?!?
If you skip the silly prose like "immiseration and humiliation" it could be from the onion, for all its silliness.
Posted by: The royal plural | Aug 8, 2004 8:35:40 PM
The Chalabis are known criminals. This speaks more about those who were willing to market the Chalabis as not only unrevocable intelligence sources but as potential "Iraqi Presidential Material". People were still trying to force a Chalabi nomination as late as June this year. There should be fall out for Chalabi backers as the story gets worse.
Posted by: patience | Aug 8, 2004 10:30:12 PM
If he never goes back to Iraq because of this arrest warrant, shouldn't that be a huge story?
Well, it would be, if there were not the precedent for Chalabi family members to stay away from countries where they've been indicted or convicted. Alas, this is dog-bites-man territory.
Posted by: ahem | Aug 9, 2004 12:51:20 AM
It's getting bloody between the State Department and DOD.
Yikes!
Posted by: Dick Durata | Aug 9, 2004 1:40:35 AM
Juan Cole this morning seems to think Chalabi may have a position, or at least influence in the upcoming elected government(if there is one, and if it isn't a sham).
On the one hand, Chalabi knows where the bodies are buried, on the other, he knows how to keep a secret. He will be back.
Posted by: bob mcmanus | Aug 9, 2004 11:33:04 AM
What do we really know about Salem?
Other than that he's unfortunate enough to have his uncle's face, body and glow?
Posted by: Tilli (Mojave Desert) | Aug 10, 2004 1:26:20 AM
Why Chalabi? He shared neocon mentors (Wohlstetter) with Wolfowitz while at the U of C.
Something out of a crappy Clancy (aren't they all) spy novel if you ask me...
Posted by: Troy | Aug 10, 2004 6:39:13 AM
Chalabi conencted to anthrax attack of '01? I'd be interested to know.
Posted by: Tip | Aug 10, 2004 12:39:45 PM

