« No Draft Here | Main | Putinization Watch »
Schools As Terror Targets
You may recall that a little while back the administration was hyping some dubious-looking intelligence suggesting that terrorists were targeting public schools for terrorist attacks. At the time most people thought that was an effort to stoke Beslan-type fears among so-called "security moms" but it occurs to me that in my admittedly limited experience, public schools are often used as polling places on Election Day. I don't know how widespread that is outside of New York City, but if a lot public schools in, say, Cleveland are used this way then a warning a couple of days before the election that al-Qaeda is planning an Election Day attack on Cleveland schools/voting booths that could be a very effective vote-suppression tactics. Do readers know if schools are used this way in their area?
UPDATE: The fear here is that the administration will name specific schools that are in heavily Democratic neighborhoods. The precinct where I grew up must have been 90 percent Democratic, so even if Republicans were four times as likely to believe the warning and be scared off, the net effect would still be pro-GOP.
October 18, 2004 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345160fd69e200d83459fba969e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Schools As Terror Targets:
» Gift Basket
from Tom Jamme's Blog
Sweet Blessings, a new Christian-based online shop featuring cookie bouquets, candy bouquets and gift baskets, opens with a campaign to donate a portion of all profits to Habitat For Humanity. The devastation of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, while not a... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 7, 2005 9:40:13 AM
» Gift Basket
from Tom Jamme's Blog
Sweet Blessings, a new Christian-based online shop featuring cookie bouquets, candy bouquets and gift baskets, opens with a campaign to donate a portion of all profits to Habitat For Humanity. The devastation of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, while not a... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 7, 2005 9:42:02 AM
Comments
Good point about tying the scare tactic with voter suppression. My polling place in Alexandria, VA is a school, as was the case when I voted in the Dem primary earlier this year in Ann Arbor, MI.
Posted by: Haggai | Oct 18, 2004 12:31:53 PM
Schools are used as polling places all over Maryland. Good point.
Posted by: Bruce Garrett | Oct 18, 2004 12:33:37 PM
Public schools are polling places in the Chicago area as well. But people here just write off anything Ashcroft or Ridge has to say these days. And we have lots of activist judges here too!
Posted by: Greg | Oct 18, 2004 12:33:45 PM
Lol you sound like a liberal, Matt.
I noticed Jeralynn Merritt recently saying you finally sounded like one.
I really don't have anything to say, sorry, 'capet all these liberals absolutely love you, Mathew. They must be onto to something, eh?
Take care, stud.
Posted by: paradox | Oct 18, 2004 12:34:08 PM
I also vote at a public school in Mass.
Posted by: mark | Oct 18, 2004 12:35:05 PM
If I still lived in Shaker Heights, OH where I grew up, I would be voting in a school (SH being a pretty strong Dem. suburb of Cleveland)
Posted by: Goldberg | Oct 18, 2004 12:36:30 PM
Polling places can be nearly anywhere, including people's garages. Senior housing seems to be popular as well. The link to schools strikes me as a little tenuous, though I wouldn't dismiss it completely.
Posted by: Paul Callahan | Oct 18, 2004 12:36:39 PM
Washington D.C. "polling places":
http://www.dcboee.org/polplaces/Polplaces1.asp
Lots of schools (and churches) listed.
Posted by: SoCalJustice | Oct 18, 2004 12:37:59 PM
Schools are used as polling places in California, but mine would be a fire station if I had one. Here, if a precinct has too few voters, we have to vote absentee. But, back to the issue at hand, I used to live in Missouri and schools were used as polling places there too. So, you may have found the reason for the odd warning about schools being attacked. Depress the voting at those sites by just a few percent and the election results may be reversed.
Posted by: Vaughn Hopkins | Oct 18, 2004 12:38:59 PM
One problem with that theory. Doesn't it seem that Republicans are more likely to believe what Ridge and Co say that angry Democrats.
What good is voter supression if it would/could effect your side more than the other?
Posted by: iamnota | Oct 18, 2004 12:42:02 PM
Schools are the traditional polling place throughout the South. It seems to me the first warning was the usual ploy to heighten fear and push up Bush's numbers. If we get another school warning at this point, you are likely on to something.
Posted by: keith | Oct 18, 2004 12:43:55 PM
And I hear the administration has hired space aliens to fain an attack on the earth, which President Bush will single-handedly fight off on live breaking news coverage on 1 NOV.
WTF, get a grip on yourselves. The American public is generally so lazy and self-centered; all you would have to do to get the cable companies to run free pay per view channels, and sponsor a 50% off deliveries from Pizza Hut for the day. No need to scare anybody to keep them home.
Posted by: Kevin | Oct 18, 2004 12:45:27 PM
I wonder if the administration will do anything as blatant as raise the color level for the election. It seemed obvious to me that it was being choreographed at the beginning of the Iraq invasion. Was I the only one to notice that it was lowered just in time for the Riyadh bombings in April 2003.
Since that time, they have not used it much, but I still wouldn't put anything past these fearmongers.
Posted by: Paul Callahan | Oct 18, 2004 12:46:38 PM
Here's a question: What happens in the Rocky Mountain states if there's a big snowstorm on election day?
Posted by: Jon H | Oct 18, 2004 12:49:00 PM
Schools are used as polling places in St. Louis, MO.
Posted by: david | Oct 18, 2004 12:54:11 PM
I think the test will be to observe whether the schools alert is repeatedly with any geographical specificity. An alert aimed at schools in, say Florida, would have a very ambiguous effect. But an alert aimed at schools in Democratic leaning areas of Florida would be more telling. So far, I don't see any evidence that this is where the alerts area leading to.
But there are still 15 days to go..
Posted by: Dan Ryan | Oct 18, 2004 12:54:27 PM
I agree with iamnota. I think a disproportionately high number of the people who are scared by this type of thing are Bush voters.
Posted by: joe | Oct 18, 2004 1:00:08 PM
Schools are the standard polling places through most of Wisconsin, too - - at least in urban areas. Town halls are more common up north.
Posted by: Aspen | Oct 18, 2004 1:03:06 PM
I think the test will be to observe whether the schools alert is repeatedly with any geographical specificity.
Watch for Tommy Thompson to announce a one day flu vaccination clinic in Palm Beach on Nov. 2.
Posted by: Paul Callahan | Oct 18, 2004 1:10:48 PM
" think the test will be to observe whether the schools alert is repeatedly with any geographical specificity"
I fail to see how you can so casually presume that, if we DID get intelligence on a possible attack on a polling place, that it couldn't possibly include any hint as to where it would happen.
You folks have gotten so paranoid about Bush, that there's literally nothing he could do that you wouldn't find some malign purpose behind, short of perhaps resigning from office.
Come to think of it, if he did THAT, you'd assume he wanted Kerry to take the hit for something he knew was coming, so that he could make a comeback in 2008...
Posted by: Brett Bellmore | Oct 18, 2004 1:11:27 PM
I find it amazing how few people know that the "schools" terror alert that came out on Oct 8th really first came out on Sept 30th and then was only issued nationwide the night of the 2nd debate.
see this
Terror or Re-Election Alerts
These School alerts were politically motivated -
Scare the "Security moms"
Clever eh...
Posted by: sgo | Oct 18, 2004 1:11:55 PM
After experiencing the terrorist attacks on high schools in The Philippines and after the Beslan massacre, we know for a fact that nothing like that can ever happen again, especially after Chechen terrorists crossed into America from Mexico.
http://moderncrusader.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Modern Crusader | Oct 18, 2004 1:12:00 PM
You folks have gotten so paranoid about Bush, that there's literally nothing he could do that you wouldn't find some malign purpose behind,
Explain again. What's the disadvantage to being paranoid? Being wrong sometimes is only an embarrassment if your goal is to receive the accolades of the chattering class. I agree that Bush may sometimes undertake actions without ulterior motives, but it's not going to stop me from being wary of nearly everything his administration does.
Posted by: Paul Callahan | Oct 18, 2004 1:20:41 PM
Yep in Milwaukee - a very democratic part of the state. I don't know how much our 10 electoral votes will matter, but keeping the Milwaukee vote low would guarantee a win for Bush.
Posted by: N. Ziarek | Oct 18, 2004 1:27:40 PM
Here's an excerpt from the Washington Times report on the Chechens in AZ story:
The intelligence report was supplied to the U.S. government in late August or early September and was based on information from an intelligence source that has been proved reliable in other instances, one official was quoted as saying.
But he added that he did not know whether the report was true.
It's a long way from there to state unequivocally that "Chechen terrorists crossed into America from Mexico."
Posted by: John | Oct 18, 2004 1:35:11 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.